Current Accountant
The reason there was conflict over the
staff changes was because of lack of communication with other employees. During
the board meeting, Brian announced that there was a new hire for the finance
director position. Based on the argument by the other members, it was evident
that they did not want a new employee to take the position because the current
temporary accountant was performing just fine. The reason for the strife over
the staff change was because employees were afraid of change. The employees were
very resistant to change because they believed that the current accountant who
has been working for the organization in the past twenty years was very loyal
and performing his duties accordingly. Thus, they found no reason for the
change. The employees also feared that they could not find anyone else who
would perform his duties like the way Joe performed his duties as the
accountant.
I believe that the conflict over staff
changes occurred because of the employee’s fear that the new way would not be
better. The employees believed that things were going well with the old
accountant; thus, they did not find any reason to hire a new finance director
because they feared that it would not lead to any improvement. During the
meeting, Dan asked whether the person was going to do more than the current
accountant or it was just a fancy title of the finance director (Jameson,
2010). It is an indication that the employees thought that the change the
executive director was proposing would not result in any improvement. The
strife occurred because employees were resisting the forward movement since
they felt satisfied with how things were going on in the company.
Informal communication
network
Informal communication refers to a
casual form of information sharing used in personal, conversations with family
members and friends. A bridge refers to members of a clique creating
connections with other cliques. The liaison tends to link the clique, but they
are not members of the clique. The gatekeepers are people who tend to ration
access to other members of a clique and also to resources. The isolate is
usually outside the main interaction of the clique and the wider organization.
They are usually less experienced, younger, and dissatisfied with the
organization. The opinion leaders are influential people who normally interact
a lot with others (Powell et al. 2013). They tend to exercise expert and
referent power. The cosmopolite also the boundary spanners are the key link
between the organization and the outside world.
From the case study, the executive
director, Brian, is an opinion leader. Opinion leaders tend to play a key role
in defining the popular issues and also influencing the opinions of others
regarding them. An opinion leader is usually informed because of being more
exposed to different activities and relationships (Powell et al. 2013). In the
case study, when Eileen is looking for any information regarding Helping
Others, she considers talking to Brian because he can provide more information
about the organization. As an opinion leader, Brian also takes the
responsibility of communicating with other employees in the organization
regarding any changes that the organization is considering. Because of the
exposure and his influencing abilities, Brian tends to play a fundamental role
in the organization when it comes to spreading ideas, opinions, and values.
Brian tends to participate in providing information to his employees and has an
influence on the change process.
Organizational culture
Organization culture refers to the
behavior of humans within the organization, and the meaning people attach to
those behaviors. The mission of the organization in the case study is to
provide social and instrumental support to the senior population in the county
of North Carolina (Jameson, 2010). The organization in the case study has a
clan oriented culture. The clan oriented culture tends to be a family line that
focuses on mentoring, nurturing, and also doing things together. The clan
culture tends to emphasis on loyalty, commitment and mutual trust (Powell et
al. 2013). The organization has flexible operating procedures, leaders are
mentors and resemble an extended family. The culture is evident when the
employees are describing the organization.
According to Maryanne, employees in the
organization usually work together to make sure that everything get done. Most
employees consider the staff in the organization as being close just like a
family. Maryanne considered the staff in the organization as being very
friendly and work collaboratively to make sure that they accomplish the mission
of the organization. Diana also claimed that the interaction in the workplace
is excellent as there is a lot of face-to-face communication. Every employee in
the organization is friendly, and the organization has an open-door policy. In
the clan oriented culture, the organization tends to respect relationships with
clients, workers, community, and the environment. Typical of a clan culture,
the organization is just like an extended family where there are high morale
and employees mentor each other.
Reference
Jameson,
K. (2010). Growing pains. In J. Keyton & P. Shockley-Zalabak
(Eds.), Case
studies for organizational communication:
Understanding Communication Processes
(3rd ed.; pp. 46-52). New York: Oxford
University Press.
Richmond,
P., McCroskey, C., & Powell, L. (2013). Organizational
communication for
Survival (5th ed.). New
York: Allyn & Bacon.
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in nursing essay writing service services. If you need a similar paper you can place your order from research paper services.
Comments
Post a Comment